Review: Showa 282 Gloves || Preferred cold & wet solution, but imperfect

The Showa 282 Gloves, which feature a textured and abrasion-resistant waterproof/breathable shell, with an insulating acrylic liner. They’re the best option I’ve found for hiking and running in cold-and-wet conditions, but they’re still imperfect.

When hiking or running in cold and wet conditions, keeping my hands comfortable has been a chronic challenge. On multiple occasions I’ve pulled into a campsite, trailhead, aid station, or my house with inoperable and painful fingers.

To minimize (or perhaps even, to end) this suffering, this summer I looked beyond conventional rain mitts like the REI Minimalist Waterproof Mittens and Outdoor Research Revel Mitts, which are fundamentally flawed, especially for long-term use, for reasons I explained at the start of my search.

In July on the Pfiffner Traverse Yo-yo, I carried Grease Monkey Neoprene Long Cuff Gloves, which I found at the local Home Depot for $5 and which weigh 3.0 oz in size Extra Large. They kept my hands dry, but I kept looking for a better option: they were smelly, cold to the touch, and annoyingly grabby (and thus fussy to put on or take off, especially if my hand was damp).

These $5 latex gloves kept my hands dry, but they were smelly, cold to the touch, and grabby.

Review: Showa 282 Temres Gloves

The better option proved to be the Showa 282 Gloves, which were recommended to me by Jakuchu Ito, a reader from Japan, where the 282 gloves are reportedly popular with hikers and backcountry skiers, as well as “people in the fishing industry etc. that have to deal with ice and cold water a lot.”

I used the 282 gloves during Ultra Trail du Mont Blanc (UTMB) and while guiding trips in the High Sierra. Conditions in both locations were conducive to testing. During UTMB I faced intermittent rain throughout the race, plus wet snow and near-freezing temperatures on some of the high passes. And in the High Sierra, morning low temperatures were regularly in the 20’s, and one day we had accumulating snow that transitioned into cold rain.

Sporting the 282 gloves on a crisp September morning in the High Sierra at 11,000 feet, with temperatures still in the 30’s.

The Showa 282 gloves have a waterproof/breathable polyurethane shell and an insulating acrylic liner. I have found them to be reliably waterproof, moderately warm, and sufficiently durable. They’re also cheap, at just $20 including shipping. Among the options I have tried, these are the most effective solution yet for keeping hands comfortable while hiking or running in cold rain.

However, if the goal is to make perfect rain handwear, the 282 gloves have room for improvement, specifically with the liner and design.

Key specs

  • Weight: 3.5 oz (size L), 4.2 oz (size XL)
  • Textured waterproof/breathable polyurethane shell
  • Articulated fingers
  • Seamless knit acrylic liner
  • 10.6-11.0 inches long (270-280 mm) when flat, from tip to cuff
  • $20 on Amazon with Prime shipping


In a Showa brochure, the waterproof/breathable shell (branded as Temres) is described as “micro-ventilated polyurethane.” But I’ve been unable to find specs for hydrostatic head or MVTR, or more information about its construction.

Based on my field use, I would describe the shell as reliably waterproof and marginally breathable. I’d prefer this combination (over, say, temporarily waterproof and reasonably breathable) because there is an easy solution for overheating hands: take your gloves off. The material reminds me of Columbia’s Outdry Extreme, which does not rely on a fragile DWR finish to remain waterproof.

The shell is textured, for improved grip on items like trekking poles, zipper pulls, and shelter guylines. However, the 282 does not have sufficient dexterity to, say, tie a shoelace. The material is somewhat rigid, and the shell was molded in a natural hand shape, with articulated fingers and thumb.

The shell has a micro texture for improved grip.

For backpacking, the shell seems amply durable. My pair shows no signs of use after a few weeks in the field, despite abrading them against trekking poles, grabbing granite talus, and snapping fire wood. In the EN 388 test for industrial gloves, it scores 4/4 for abrasion-resistance and 2/4 for tear-resistance; its puncture- and cut-resistance is marginal, at 1/4, with a score of 0 being the worst.


The seamless knit acrylic liner serves two functions.

  • Insulates the hand from cold ambient temperatures; and,
  • Buffers the hand from moisture inside the glove, e.g. accumulated perspiration.

Unfortunately, it’s the least durable component of the 282 gloves. My liner is badly pilling (though it’s not shedding). More problematic is that it’s detaching from the shell, which can result in misalignment between the fingers/thumb of the liner with the fingers/thumb of the shell.

The liner adds warmth and buffers the hand from moisture, but its durability is questionable. Notice the extensive pilling after just a few weeks of use.

Showa also makes a liner-less version of the 282, the Showa 281 Gloves (my review), which can be worn barehanded in mild-and-wet conditions, or paired with a lightweight liner glove like the DeFeet Duraglove Wool (my favorite) for cooler temperatures. They are not as warm as the 282 gloves when paired with a liner glove, as I needed to do when temperatures were in the 20’s and 30’s.


A local retailer is unlikely to stock the Showa gloves, so they’ll probably need to be purchased online without trying them on. I’ll share my sizing experience, to help you.

My hand size:

  • Length: 8.25 inches from wrist to tip of middle finger, + 0.125 inches for glove liner;
  • Width: 8.25 inches around the palm, + 0.25 inches for glove liner; and,
  • Middle finger: 3.375 inches (3 3/8) from base to tip.

I purchased the 282 in two sizes:

  • Large fits very well when worn barehanded, although I’d like the fingers to be a smidge longer. When paired with the Duraglove liner, the Large is too restrictive.
  • X-Large is a bit clumsy when worn barehanded, but doable. When worn with the Duraglove liner, the fit is excellent.

The acrylic liner packs out after some use. If a size feels slightly tight when brand new, it’s probably the right one for you.


If Showa was interested in making handwear that was optimized for backpacking and hiking in cold rain, it would make two changes to the 281/282.

First, it would offer a mitt, which is inherently warmer (and lighter and easier to manufacture). Gloves have more dexterity, but that’s rarely called for — and, on those occasions, it’s easy to take off a mitt and then put it back on.

Second, the cuff must be narrower, or have an adjustment (e.g. webbing with ladder-lock buckle). The width and length of the 281/282 cuff makes it difficult to shingle underneath the wrist cuffs of a waterproof/breathable jacket. When not shingled properly, rain water can run down the arms and into the gloves. For a better design, reference the aforementioned REI and OR rain mitts.

Disclosure. I strive to offer field-tested and trustworthy information, insights, and advice. I have no financial affiliations with or interests in any brands or products, and I do not publish sponsored content

This website is supported by affiliate marketing, whereby for referral traffic I receive a small commission from select vendors like Amazon or REI, at no cost to the reader. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Posted in , , on October 30, 2017
Tags: ,


  1. Mike on October 30, 2017 at 9:27 am

    On the image of the inside of the glove you say it’s pulling instead of pilling. (Don’t publish my comment, I just want to let you know of the error).

  2. PS on October 30, 2017 at 9:34 am

    And they need a different color than smurfy blue. LOL.

  3. Paul Beiser on October 30, 2017 at 10:03 am

    Thanks VERY much Andrew! Just ordered a pair..

  4. Bret Grover on October 30, 2017 at 1:29 pm

    Have you looked at/tried the sealskinz gloves? they have several styles and am wondering how they stack up. They have been on Massdrop recently for $20-30.

    • Andrew Skurka on October 30, 2017 at 2:27 pm

      It’s been a very long time. My only experience with them, probably a decade ago, was very negative, with delamination of the entire sock.

      I’m generally skeptical of membranes that rely on DWR, which I think these do, as well as face fabrics that are susciptible to wet out, which again these are. I imagine having a hand stuck in a damp glove surrounded by a soaking wet fabric that takes forever to dry. What am I missing? What’s been your experience?

      • Bret Grover on October 30, 2017 at 3:45 pm

        I have not tried them, the $70 regular price tag has kept me from wanting to try them out, but for $30 possibly. I recently tried the grease monkey neoprene gloves with a thin fleece liner ( I found your post afterwards) and I didn’t have the problem of cold feel, but I will agree that they are “sticky” or hard to grab things other than trekking poles.

  5. ian on October 30, 2017 at 2:10 pm

    We use Atlas gloves commercial fishing in Alaska, but never the insulated version you are using. Even in the winter you hands will get sweaty and gross with the insulated version. The insulated gloves are also impossible to dry.

    The setup we use in both winter and summer is the un-insulated version of Atlas gloves and and a light cotton liner. You will stay just as warm as the insulated version, but you when your hands get damp you can switch out liners. Fresh liners basically gives you a new glove feel, even if the pvc glove is damp. It’s a way better set up than the insulated Atlas.

    You can get both glove and liner on Amazon. Go with a size larger on the gloves to fit the liner.

    Glove – SHOWA Atlas 620

    Liner – Ansell ThermaKnit 78-101

    • Andrew Skurka on October 30, 2017 at 2:25 pm

      I have considered buying those just to compare, but went with the 280 series because they’d been recommended.

      My experience with the 282 has not been as negative as you suggest it might be. Yes, some perspiration does build up, but it’s easy to vent your hands — you just take the glove off. In fact, I returned from a 90-minute run in 33 degrees and freezing drizzle, and used these gloves comfortably the entire time, taking them off and putting them on as needed. Also, while the shell is probably not as “breathable” as the marketing claims it should be, it does have some level of breathability, unlike the 620 glove that you referenced.

      As far as a combo shell/liner (e.g. 282) or separate shell + liner (e.g. 620 + 78-101), I’m generally in agreement here. A system gives you much greater versatility than a single unit. However, there is some value in the simplicity, and the combined unit can be taken into colder temps when you use an additional liner, like I do with the 282 and Duraglove. Nonethless, my next step in this process is to find some liner-less shells like the 281, and give them a whirl.

      • Adam on December 28, 2017 at 9:30 pm

        Any thoughts on the Showa 460?

        • Andrew Skurka on December 29, 2017 at 6:01 pm

          Only can speculate based on the product description.

          Same acyrlic liner as the 282
          Unknown weight

  6. Mr Graham Faithfull on October 30, 2017 at 2:30 pm

    Have you come across Buffalo Mitts? Not made from Buffalos 🐃, but a pile and pertex construction. They are not technically waterproof but you don’t feel cold and wet when they are soaked. And they are made in Sheffield England.

    Review from Ray Mears website

    • Andrew Skurka on October 30, 2017 at 2:46 pm

      I know of them, but I’ve never seen them in the US.

      Whether due to body type or environmental conditions, I really struggle to be warm when wet. With a BMI of 21 (6 feet, high-150’s), wiry extremities, and a very efficient aerobic engine, I tend to get cold easily and to warm up slowly. Also, I think the thin air and low humidity of the Rockies and High Sierra makes precip feel colder — there’s less air mass and more evaporative cooling. Bottom line: I’m interested in finding a solution that keeps external precip out.

    • John on July 5, 2019 at 2:28 am

      The pertex is totally non waterproof. When you are squeezing cold water out from the ends, how can they not feel “cold and wet”?

      When dry however they are warm and lightweight, but not all that durable.

  7. Lagrandeimage on October 31, 2017 at 6:19 am

    Hello Andrew,

    I was really really looking forward to your feedback on the glove issue and I am not disapointed.

    To get this straight, there are loads of work plastic gloves on the Internet. What set these gloves apart from the bunch for you? The W/P shell? Are there not other gloves that have a W/P shell?

    For example, Showa does a lot of other glove models? Why this model and not the others?

    Just want to make sure I understand well what set these apart so I can look for similar options my side of the pond.

    Anyway, just ordered the Showa 281 because I prefer the unlined glove + liner option which I feel is more flexible. I will test this definitely but I would like to find other alternatives which are less ugly if possible and with a better cuff.

    • Andrew Skurka on October 31, 2017 at 2:50 pm

      You’re right, there are loads of waterproof gloves out there, made of polyurethane, nitrile, PVC, latex, etc. I have not tried them all, so my comparative analysis is limited. I went with the 282 model because they were recommended to me by at least two people, Jakuchu Ito (who described them as popular in Japan among backpackers and skiers) and a client who had bought them on Jakuchu’s recommendation and validated the idea to me.

      The 281/282 are partly appealing because they are breathable, not just waterproof, which will extend their comfort. I’m usually skeptical of waterproof/breathable materials, because my experience is that they’re not reliably waterproof and their breathability is over-hyped. But there are some membranes that have eliminated the Achilles heel of WP/B fabrics, the DWR finish, and perhaps the Temres shell is one of them. It’s hard to imagine how water will penetrate this stuff.

      The 281/282 also has a nicer feel to them than conventional waterproof gloves. They’re more stretchy, less rubbery, and less stiff.

      I also ordered the 281, to compare. They should be more versatile than the 282, but they won’t be as warm, e.g. 281+liner vs 282+liner. If I like them, my plan is to stitch a cuff closure onto them, and maybe hope that Showa contacts me about making a signature rain mitt. 🙂

      • Harry Mattison on April 13, 2018 at 3:17 pm

        Hi Andrew,

        Just got my 282s today. Thanks for recommending them. If you did stitch a cuff closure on yours, could you tell us a bit about it?

        • Andrew Skurka on April 19, 2018 at 10:05 am

          Haven’t put a cuff on it yet. Maybe in advance of this backpacking season.

  8. Michael on October 31, 2017 at 9:47 am


    Have you tried anything like:

    Or does this have the flawed waterproofing you were talking about?

    Can you tell me why the Showa’s work for warmth? I can see the keeping dry, but with just rubber is that enough in the cold?I get chilblains on my hands, so I would love to get this solved as winter approaches.

    • Andrew Skurka on October 31, 2017 at 2:39 pm

      “Water-resistant” doesn’t work, IMO. Normally that means the fabric has been treated with DWR. DWR quickly degrades due to abrasion, and so too does your water-resistance.

      I’m also skeptical of conventional waterproof/breathable fabrics that rely on DWR, for the same reason. Only a few fabrics have found a workaround, including Columbia’s OutdryExtreme and Gore-Tex ShakeDry.

      The 282 model has an acrylic pile liner, kind of a cheap fuzzy fleece. It’s adds warmth to the glove because it traps air between your hand and the shell (which is closer to ambient temp). The same result can be achieved by using a liner-less glove and adding your own glove liner, e.g. 281 model + DeFeet Duraglove.

  9. John on October 31, 2017 at 7:14 pm

    These Atlas blue gloves are very familiar to the tech scuba diving crowd (use for dry hands for dry suits in cold water). But most don’t end up using them because they are hard to dry out and terrible dexterity.

    I’d suggest trying these instead. Same Atlas company, but way more dexterity as they are thinner and don’t have the fragile built in liner. Instead, I simply use some reasonably thin ragg wool gloves underneath them. They’ve been down for 60+ minutes in 34 degree water at depth and done great.


    Ragg wool liners:

    And at all of $3.03 a pair, I use them all over place in the house and garage.

    If either get wet accidentally, they are cheap to swap out for a second dive. But in hiking, they’d be easily turned inside out and dry out super quick compared to the fluffy blue Atlas ones.

    • Andrew Skurka on October 31, 2017 at 7:40 pm

      Have you seen the 281/282 in person? I think the dexterity is better than you seem to think.

  10. John on October 31, 2017 at 7:53 pm

    Ah, I’m confusing them with the Atlas Showa 495. Look very similar, but different gloves.

  11. Mike on November 6, 2017 at 12:19 pm
  12. Lagrandeimage on November 7, 2017 at 5:34 am

    Hello all,

    I got my Showa 281 yesterday evening.

    Out of the box impressions :

    1) very light,
    2) good dexterity I was expecting something much more thick.
    3) tends to size small IMO : the glove is not very well sized for layering. I took an XL (the largest size available). The only liner that I could fit is a thin wool one.
    4) Easy to put on with a thin liner,, when you take it off the liner tends to come with it.

    I gave the kit (glove plus thin wool liner) a run this morning during my bicycle commute. Weather was sunny but fresh with temperatures around 8°C:
    1) Cuff was not really an issue as I stuffed it in my sleeve.
    2) right away from the start I felt cold spots from the wind.
    3) halfway through the trip, my finger tips were very cold and hurting despite the glove liner.

    So this first experience was not very convincing.

    Do note there are other factors to condider:
    1) I was dressed very lightly probably too lightly for this weather. For the last several days, I have been testing the limits of my fall equipment (short, uninsulated softshell, synthetic long sleeve tshirt, light cap and neck gaiter) and today was it. Changing to a more adapted equipment for cold weather will probably improve things as the body concentrates blood in the vital areas of the body when there is not sufficient insulation for all body parts.
    2) My hands/fingers are usually cold due to bad circulation.
    3) Using it for bicycling put the glove in a situation it may not be suited to.

    Nonetheless I am a bit skeptical on the use of this glove for cold weather because the glove is not adapted to layering. Even with adapted equipment for the rest of the body you need a certain level of insulation thickness for the fingers in cold environnement. But the glove’s size does not allow for a sufficiently thick independant liner IMVHO. Of course, YMMV according to your hand size.

    I will try to test a slightly bigger liner tonight but not sure it will fit in. I will give feedback tomorrow.

  13. Susanne Williams on November 24, 2017 at 11:54 am

    Technical divers use these as drysuit gloves. Brilliant. I use them unlined with a wool or fleece glove underneath

  14. Carl V on November 28, 2017 at 10:28 am

    I have just been reading this thread and some of the others; all of which are very interesting. My focus has become Tibetan meditation over the last 18 years, where I have spent a month in the cold of October in Indiana without a heat source. As trimming to beautify trees has been a hobby that fit well with my focus on meditation, I have spent several years climbing ropes and taking a great deal of time trimming in the winter. In the past, Tibetan meditators doing a Tummo meditation, produced heat as a byproduct of the practice. This actually is not the goal; but like being able to break a board of a certain difficulty as one advances to the next belt in Tae Kwon Doe, the production of heat indicated a meditator’s proficiency and level of accomplishment. Most meditations work with the normal waking mind, but certain practices, of which Tummo is one, allow a meditator to achieve a subtlety of mind usually associated with dream sleep or even deep sleep and even somewhat deeper levels, yet where the meditator is extremely cognizant. As a byproduct of such practices, heat is produced. Young Tibetan tummo meditators used to have contests where a hole was cut in the ice of a mountain lake, cotton towels were dipped in the ice water and put on each of the meditators shoulders, and whoever dried the most towels by dawn was declared the winner.
    The fringe benefit of such a practice, was that such meditators required very little heat in their mountain caves and huts over multiple years allowing them to achieve great levels of subltlety of mind, one pointedness, and increasing levels of profundity.

    Another more external version of Tummo, is all about generating heat in the body. Both kinds, internal and external, end up cultivating chi or energy in all of the accupuncture channels as is done to some extent in Tae Kwon Doe, Tia Chi, and other such practices.

    After experiencing a little of the benefits of such practices for winter Tree climbing and trimming as well as in meditation, I came upon an interesting course by Wim Hoff that I have found helpful. It is relatively quick and accessible, focuses on cultivating the second kind of Tummo, and in particular, he has special practices for the hands and feet. Also, research is showing that brown fat produces heat, is brown from the amount of mitochondria in the fat, and is derived from muscle tissue. A lot of our western sports, like running, or daily routine work, concentrate on certain areas of the body, whereas more eastern practices can have a more balanced approach and can get the chi moving everywhere. Wim has a short course that I have taken, which has slowly evolved my showers to all cold and allows me to enjoy some cold lake swimming in northern Michigan when all the tourists are long gone. I think that Wim’s idea that progressive conditioning to cold can bring natural power to the body when subjected to cold, is a good complementary approach to be combined with warm cloths or mittens. And as one strengthens one’s natural heat, the clothing requirements will also change. For example, the Tibetan meditators that practiced tummo in the mountains and who only wore cotton robes were called: ‘repa,’ or ‘ras pa,’ meaning ‘cotton clad ones.’ Milarepa, one such yogi, famous to the Tibetans, was a great man – ‘Mila’ because he had developed meditation to the levels of enlightenment, and was cotton clad, ‘repa,’ because he wore a white cotton robe as did his followers who had developed at least the tummo levels of practice.

    Here is an infrared video of Wim and some students. He has a horse stance qigong and breathing practice that helps generate and move chi:
    Watch “the iceman, training by Wim Hof” on YouTube
    Infrared video

    Here is a pretty good discussion of brown fat: Characteristics of Those with Higher Levels of Brown Fat
    Brown fat derived from muscle – produces heat.

    Here is a student showing a little of Wim’s method of how to acclimate hands and feet to cold: Watch “Complete Wim Hof Method Cold Water Routine for Feet and Hands” on YouTube
    Video by student.

    Here are some experiences that others have had with Wim’s hand and feet method:
    Anyone got any experience with improvement of cold hands? – BecomingTheIceman

    Because these techniques make use of certain physical movements and breathing techniques, I think ultimately, the Tibetan internal approach is orders of magnitude more powerful. For pliancy, both physical and mental, develops with advanced meditative stabilization in general, and in partucular, internal tummo is achieved by being able to bring that one pointedness to certain points in the body. Then, as a result, the mind can reach extreme levels of subtlety and tummo flows all the time. So, this is how the path for warm mittens can lead one toward enlightenment, which is also a byproduct of internal tummo, and for Tibetan meditators, their goal. In any event, I hope Wim’s methods can be helpful here.

  15. Jakuchu Ito on December 13, 2017 at 11:53 pm

    Hi, may I just say it is awesome to me that you actually experimented with this Japanese UL glove system. Very interesting to see the 282 seems to work ok for you and in the conditions you move in.

  16. Katherine on July 30, 2018 at 8:20 pm

    I was just rereading this to check the sizing (and order via the link). Nice that you give us—the measurement for—your middle finger. I missed that detail the first time around.

  17. Justin LaFrance on May 18, 2019 at 11:28 am

    Andrew, what are your thoughts on the Showa 306 glove? The product brochure describes it as “the ultimate outdoor companion”.

    • Andrew Skurka on May 19, 2019 at 6:45 am

      They’re described only as being “water repellent,” but it’s unclear to me why — the latex should be waterproof, so maybe it’s in reference to the elasticized wrist cuff.

  18. Brian on October 23, 2019 at 11:39 am

    Andrew, have you tried any of the Glacier Gloves? They’re designed for cold weather kayaking and are advertised as 100% waterproof. I bought a pair of the Perfect Curve from Amazon for $23 for the Bear 100 this year. They have 2mm of fleece inside neoprene and while I didn’t have to wear them during the race, they are comfortable and feel warm while being advertised as 100% waterproof. They’re a bit grippier than I would like but I’m willing to sacrifice if they keep my hands warm.

    • Andrew Skurka on October 23, 2019 at 11:46 am

      I have not tried them. The issue with neoprene is that it dries very slowly — once it’s wet, it stays wet until it’s exposed to heat for hours. For trail running, this might be okay, since the efforts are usually shorter. For backpacking, that doesn’t work, because your gear needs to sustain you for at least several consecutive days in crappy weather.

    • Katherine Kane on October 23, 2019 at 12:59 pm

      @Brian, but those do look awesome for *kayaking*! I dislike my current pair of neoprene paddling gloves and will keep these in mind when it comes time to replace them. Thanks for the tip.

  19. Dave Cramer on August 3, 2020 at 9:01 pm

    I learned about these from ice climbing guides in New England. I now have three pairs, and they’re awesome for ice climbing and backcountry skiing. Haven’t had problems with the liners. The only flaw is that they dry very slowly.

  20. Kevin on November 20, 2020 at 9:21 am

    It is that time of year where gloves rise to the forefront of my thoughts. Any new approaches that are better than the Showa 262 Andrew?

    • Harry on November 20, 2020 at 9:25 am

      I am tempted to try an XL pair of these the next time I might have to spend a long time out in the rain. Because they are so long they can go under the jacket without coming untucked and all the rainwater going down the jacket sleeve into the glove opening.

    • Andrew Skurka on November 20, 2020 at 11:12 am

      I did not come across anything this year that changes my opinion of these or my recommendation for handwear in cold and wet conditions.

      • Charles Gregory on December 4, 2020 at 6:26 pm

        Thank you for the review & recommendation, Andrew!

        Quick question: I normally wear a Large in gloves. Some of the Amazon reviews indicate that the sizing runs small. Do you think I’d be better off ordering a Large and having a snug fitting glove? Or should I size up to an XL?

        Thanks in advance!

        • Andrew Skurka on December 4, 2020 at 6:37 pm

          Size up.

          It’s Japanese sizing, like Montbell.

  21. Will on December 11, 2021 at 3:19 pm

    Here’s some good news – Showa has added a new 282-02 model that maintains the interior insulation, but adds a longer wrist cuff and a drawstring to help keep water out of the wrists. As I’ve been using the 282 successfully for a couple years, I’m looking forward to the -02s as (hopefully) an even better option. Here’s the link:

  22. Dumb/Dirty/Landscaper on October 13, 2022 at 6:01 pm

    yep, I use the Showa 460 for snow removal services and have to buy a new pair every year because that damn lining does the same that the 282 does. I think the 282 ran small for me too, I didn’t really like them. The 460 is the only winter work gloves I can throw on quickly, has good grip on snow blowers and shovels and takes salt and sodium chloride without breaking down or getting completely soaked.

Leave a Comment