Today we’re fortunate to have excellent online mapping platforms like CalTopo, Hillmap, GaiaGPS, and AllTrails. But until these platforms are available deep in the backcountry on devices that don’t break or need recharging, as part of my trip planning routine I export and then print my digital maps into a field-friendly paper set.
Here is how:
Exporting
Paper size. I prefer Tabloid (11 x 17 inches) paper over smaller sizes like Letter (8.5 x 11). Tabloid sheets depict a sizeable area (about 4.5 miles tall and 3.2 miles across when printed at 1:24,000 scale with quarter-inch margins) while still being field-friendly (not too big) and a standard paper size (not requiring a super high-end printer). When using smaller paper sizes like 8.5 x 11, I struggle to understand the big-picture topography and I get annoyed by how often my route cuts across pages.
Scale. I use the original map’s native scale, e.g. the 7.5-minute USGS maps are designed to be printed at 1:24,000. If I compress the image in order to fit more topographic information on a single page, the contour intervals and writing become illegible — in the specific case of USGS maps, beyond about 1:30,000. Two notes:
- The effect will be the same if I try printing 11 x 17 images on smaller paper size.
- Other maps are optimized for different scales. For example, I have National Geographic Trails Illustrated maps — which are available as a layer on AllTrails — that are at scales of 1:60,000, 1:80,000, and 1:100,000.
Shaded relief. Turn this off. While the shading causes topographic features to stand out better when looking at the map from its south border (e.g. like on a wall, computer screen, or living room floor), it makes the map difficult to read in the field when viewed from any other direction. For example, if I’m hiking south, often I’ll want to look at the map north-to-south, so that it’s oriented with the landscape. But from this angle, the map shading is inverted, so canyons look like ridges and vice versa.
Format. Ideally, the online platform exports a single multi-page print-ready PDF. If it generates only single map files, expect the printing process to consume more time for you. This can especially be a headache with large mapsets for multi-month trips.
Printing
Probably like you, I lack access to a high-end color printer for personal use. The best method I have found to print topographic maps is FedEx Office Print Online. I upload the files, specify the printing specs, pay online, and pick up the order a few hours later from my local branch at the corner of Baseline Road and Broadway.
My go-to specs are:
- Full color;
- 24-lb paper, or 30-lb for glossier and more durable prints, albeit heavier and more expensive;
- Collated, if multiple copies, so that I can easily give everyone in my group their own mapset; and, either
- Single-sided when solo, so that I can view two adjacent maps simultaneously, or
- Double-sided if one or more group members will also have a set, since we can partner up and view adjacent maps.
For single-sided full-color 11 x 17 prints, the current cost at my local FedEx Office is $1.77 per print before tax. With my corporate account (Ha, “corporate”!), the price drops to $1.18. If you expect a big printing bill, it’s worth asking about this program.
Tags:
Local libraries also have good printing options (BW is free where I live; color is .50/page). Hillmap has a good feature where you can layer sat photos and topo with differing opacity (maybe Caltopo has this too?). Definitely has come in handy a few times where key navigational landmarks weren’t big enough to feature on a USGS quad.
8.5 x 11 vs 11 x 17:
I’ve been using caltopo > FedEx office for recent trips. Love it. For me, for *on-trail* travel, I’ve found the 8.5 x 11 size promotes more frequent map checks because I can fold it in quarters and fit it easily in a hip belt. For the most recent trip, I had FedEx do double sided. Then I keep the big picture map in the side pocket for when I need the overview.
Granted, if I hiked as fast as you I’d breeze through that size too quickly!
I’ve been playing around with Caltopo and like it’s simple interface. Next trip I’m definitely going to use this site. Thanks for the post.
I have an ink jet printer that will handle 11 X 17 paper, but I’m not that comfortable with ink jet prints on plain paper. I have printed maps on plain paper and sealed them with Krylon Crystal Clear spray. This works well enough, but makes the paper much stiffer. I do have a local printer who can print much larger sizes, but I haven’t spoken to them about printing durable maps. I would think that maps printed with a color laser printer would be more durable, but I don’t have one and don’t know. Beyond paper weight, do you have any thoughts on paper and inks?
Unless I need just a map or two for a casual trip, I always have my local FedEx Office print my maps. Their laser printing is higher quality than what I can do at home, and it’s less susceptible to moisture. I don’t go crazy with map durability — for about $1.25 per 11×17 print, it’s worth it to me to have fresh maps for each trip I do.
My local prices in 2019 are $3.98 a page for single sided color 11×17. I may buy a decent laser printer. Any suggestions?
[…] It should show an overview, and the two separate maps for a total of three pages. Now save and print however you like. You’ve now finished and have your paper maps ready to roll. For an article about how to print your maps with better quality than your home printer look here. […]
Here’s another great option for durability: print at FedEx on a color laser printer, but use your own waterproof paper. Search Amazon for “waterproof paper”. Last year I got a box of 50 sheets for about $35, or $.60 per sheet. It was 8.5″ x 11″. That works out to be about $.60 per sheet.
As a test, I printed a map on this paper, and then rolled it up and put it inside a 1 quart Nalgene bottle and left it there… for about six months. I take it out to show it to my navigation classes every month or so, and is still in perfect condition.
Andrew’s suggestion of using online printing of course will not work with this technique, you need to actually be there in person to put your own paper that you bring it into the proper tray.
But, this is a small trade off, because the benefit from a completely waterproof and very durable math outweighs the small hassle an extra cost of using specialized paper.
Thanks for sharing. I could see this making sense for someone who: returns to the same area repeatedly and does not want to print fresh maps each time; or backpacks in really wet environments.
Personally, I tend to be hiking through and in dry environments. So I judged the extra expense of WP paper to not be worthwhile. I see a PDX in your email handle (airport code for Portland) so I suspect your situation is different in at least one regard.
Also, For anyone interested in a quick overview of using Caltopo, there is a nice tutorial on YouTube that covers how to do it. Search YouTube for “Caltopo”. The first video that comes up is from the Columbia River Orienteering Club, that’s a good place to start. The founder of Caltopo, Matt Jacobs, also has a few tutorials that he put up the cover some of the more advanced features.
Very useful. Also, you’ve mentioned before that 11×17 folds well to fit into a “baggie”.
I would add: solo hiker can print:
physical map 1 front – map 1;
physical map 1 back – map 3;
physical map 2 front – map 2;
etc.
1/2 the weight, just as convenient
Yes, an 11×17 fits almost perfectly into a gallon-sized bag when folded in half. If you chop the half-inch margins off, it fits perfectly, and you can seal the bag in the event of precip.
I hadn’t thought of that printing scheme. Can you specify that on a print order, or is a manual thing?
Never looked at trying it with a print order. I feel safer knowing it is right before I send it off to the printer.
I’m using a Mac now, so I can easily move PDF thumbnails around to whatever order I want them printed.
I just did it for KCHBR and it was a little trickier than usual because I had to slip in a few of the alternate route maps (which I think are soon to be part of the primary route) in their proper place. All good though because it helped me become more familiar with the route.
Any idea of how I print at Staples or Fedex a PDF file of a USGS map tthat has satellite imagery without the imagery. If I was doing it home I could just click on the eye to turn the layer off
I don’t understand your question. Try again.
Not sure what program you are using to export the PDF. In CalTopo, you can specify a single layer, or a mix of them, and it’ll print as a PDF what you’re showing on the screen.
Sorry about that I am internet deprived due to a storm. I downloaded the maps from the USGS website as PDF files and uploaded them for printing via the Staples website. When my internet is restored I will look at Caltopo. Thanks
I’m wondering if anyone has experience exporting and printing maps using international maps such as either UK OS or OSI (ireland)?
Thanks!
It’s probably not as good as goverment-produced topo maps, but you can access OpenStreetMap in Caltopo. That product has a few different datasets, including OpenStreetMap, OpenCycleMap, and TF Outdoors.
How do I specify 11×17 from the FedEx online printing website? I’m trying to print your KCHBR maps, and although I see how to select 24-lb vs 32, 1- vs 2-sided etc, there does not seem to be an option to pick Tabloid paper.
Paper size is dictated by the submitted file. In your case, the file spec is 11 x 17, and FedEx will assume this unless otherwise told.
HI Andrew,
Your site is so great, thank you for all the work you put into it. Can you please show me how to do this with gaia GPS. I have both my tablet and the online version. I looked at Fed x and they have classic or Beta site to place an order. i have a pretty ;arge area id like to have printed off . How do i make sure all the way points , polygons etc.. are in the map and the area is covered. Thank you
To export digital maps to paper, I use Caltopo, not Gaia. In CalTopo, look for the “Print” option at the top of the screen.
If you have annotated maps in Gaia, you can export the file and import it into CalTopo, but you probably will lose some of the content, and the formatting will definitely change. Personally, I annotate the maps in CalTopo, then export a very basic GPX file into Gaia so that I can easily download the necessary digital maps onto my phone and have some key landmarks in the app.
I’ve played around a bit with CalTopo. I like it a lot! I’ve only printed on 8.5”X11” in 1:24000. When I put a protractor on it the scale is slightly off. I’m just experimenting for free before I do a paid version of it. Am I doing something wrong?
I can’t imagine that it’s off, but I’ll forward your email to Matt the owner.
When you make your print tiles, are you clicking the “print to scale” box and then specifying 1:24k? Just because you are working with 7.5 min maps does not mean they must be or will be printed at 1:24k
Could I email you directly? I’ve played around a bit. I see no option to resize the maps other than to change the grid scale
Here is my “print screen” window, which opens in a new window after clicking “Print” at the top of Caltopo and selecting “Print to PDF or JPG.”
Notice in the upper-left corner that there is a dropdown box for “Scale.”
I don’t know the intricacies of the various subscription levels, but it’s possible that the more basic levels (or when you’re not even logged in) don’t have all of these features.
I’ve been trying to print USGS maps but I’m worried that if I print the maps on the wrong sheet of paper that it won’t by 1:24,000 scale anymore. Does anyone have any advice?
From what program are you trying to export the maps for printing?
If you are using CalTopo and are in the “print mode” window (from the main page, click on print in top menu, and it’ll open a new window), you’ll see a drop-down menu with available paper sizes and scales. Most home printers can only do 8.5×11 or smaller.
Caltopo doesn’t even HAVE a print button, at least on my Android. I’ll try from laptop later, but pretty useless as is. I have very high quality PDF USGS topos downloaded, but the FedEx method as described is not the way their system works currently. You have to specify that it is a custom job, write a note detailing what you’re after, and hope the FedEx employee gets it right. No thanks.
To print you must be on the website, not in the app.
Yes! Worked fine printing from home 👍. Still haven’t looked at sending to FedEx, but I’m hopeful!
Thank you for sharing. Makes me wish a printing place was local for me. I use Adobe reader to print it on 4 pages (8.5×11) and tape together. It makes it unwieldy, but I can see everything. I plan on covering it in contact paper, so I have yet to see how well it fits in my pack afterwards.
Your FedEx printing link appears to be broken. Do you have a new method of printing?
Looks like it’s properly redirecting to, https://www.fedex.com/en-us/printing/online-printing.html
If you click on “Start order” in the banner, it will get you going. Under Document Printing, select Copies & Custom Projects.
My bad. I was thinking the link would direct to the specific product you use. Thanks for the clarification. Great content all around.
Hi Andrew, I came across your post and it really helped me figure out the scale aspects of printing a map. I’m in the process of trying to print a Caltopo map but at a much larger size. About 4×5 feet. I was wondering if you had any ideas or suggestions of how to ensure that I’ll be able to read the small trails and labels? The map is of the state of Colorado with its hiking/ohv trails and I’ll be mounting it to a wall. I’m working on creating the map now. Considering FedEx as a printing service for this project.
I think you will struggle to print out a map of the entire state on 4×5′ paper while still keeping it legible with such details.
As a point of comparison, on my wall I have a Raven map of the state, https://www.instagram.com/p/BsCSNKNl-vH, and it’s printed at 1:500k. It includes interstates and state highways, but no detail beyond that (e.g. major trails like the Colorado Trail, USFS roads, residential roads, etc.). If they did add that kind of detail, the map would be excessively noisy, to the degree that it’d no longer be useful. I fear you will end up in a similar situation.
As another point of comparison, this road & recreation atlas for Colorado uses a scale of 1:200,000. I think that’s probably about the scale you want for your project. But suddenly your paper size is going to get much bigger — if my Raven map at 500k is 4.5 feet wide, your map at a 200k scale will be over 11 feet wide!
Hey Andrew – great article on this, I’ve recently needed to do some map printing and this is exactly the information I needed for some things I didn’t think of. A couple questions if you could help:
-Which of the three mapping services would you recommend (CalTopo, GAIA, AllTrails)? I’m mostly mapping for some off trail navigation work in forested areas with a lot of frequent ridges and valleys of 200-400′ relief. Clear topo is vital.
-I’ve been messing around with CalTopo for a project and trying to turn off the shaded relief before creating a PDF to print. Can’t find where, may a paid feature, or maybe easier on GAIA, etc?
Thanks for your help!
CalTopo is the best desktop platform, hands down. And it’s app is entirely functional, and it’s really convenient that your CalTopo desktop maps feed directly into your app.
Gaia has the best app, hands down. It’s desktop site is functional, except for its map-making feature, which is woefully inadequate, to the degree that it’s a deal-breaker for anyone who plans to print more than one map.
It’s been years since I used AllTrails. But my sense of it then, and my sense of it now based on what I see in search results and conversations with others, is that it’s best for people who want to follow prescribed routes that have been created by others.