I received my first Fancy Feast stove from Ryan Bozis (aka Major Slacker), who attended one of my presentations in Virginia in Spring 2006. I of course thanked him for it, but given how simple the stove was, I could not imagine that it was better than the stove that I had used for most of my Sea-to-Sea Route hike, an open jet model made from Red Bull cans, similar to the one in the picture to the right.
But then I tested it against my original stove and some stoves I had purchased from MiniBullDesigns.com, and I found that it was the fastest and most fuel efficient of them all. Moreover, it was slightly lighter than the other designs; its simple design meant it involved fewer materials, less time, and hardly any expense; it doubled as its own pot stand, which helped to simplify my whole cook system; and it did not require any pre-heating. I have been using this model since Summer 2006; I used the same stove for my entire 7-month Great Western Loop hike.
3-oz Fancy Feast cat food can, or another can of the same size. I can usually find the Fancy Feast knock-off brand for $.39 at my local grocery store.
1-hole punch. A standard hole punch is adequate, but an arts & craft model that has a bigger reach is easier to use. With my pole punch I can punch holes 2 inches from the edge of a can or paper sheet, whereas with a standard hole punch I'd be limited to about .75 inches.
Marker. Its color and tip style do not matter.
Butter knife, spoon, pliers, or anything else made of metal that has a hard, round edge.
Tape ruler. If you want to be a perfectionist, you might want one. I have never used one; I eyeball it instead.
1. Remove the cat food and wash out the can.
2. Flatten the sharp edge that was left by the lid with the end of a butter knife, in order to avoid being cut.
3. Mark 16 evenly spaced tick marks around the lip of the can. If you are a perfectionist, this is when you would use the tape measure. I don't think the tick marks need to be perfectly evenly spaced, so I just eyeball it, like I would in cutting a pizza. "Cut" the can in half, then fourths, then eights, and finally sixteenths.
4. Just below the lip of can and using the tick marks as a guide, make 16 hole punches. Avoid breaking the tin between the holes by keeping them far enough apart - about one-eighth of an inch.
5. Below the first layer of hole punches, make another 16 hole punches. The middle of the bottom holes should be directly underneath the 1/8-inch gaps between the upper holes.
Alcohol stoves are more susceptible to wind than conventional backpacking stoves, and therefore a good windscreen is a critical part of the system. I make my wind stoves from aluminum foil (e.g. Reynolds Wrap), which is cheaper than making them from broiler pans or purchasing commercial windscreens like those from MSR and BackpackingLight.com.
To make the wind screen, do the following:
This stove is extremely easy to use. Pour denatured alcohol into the stove, light the alcohol with a match, wait 20-30 seconds for the fuel to warm up, and then put your pot on top of the stove.
I typically boil slightly less water than my meal actually requires but optimum consistency/texture. Once the food has absorbed all of the water I boiled, I then add non-boiled water until the correct consistency is achieved. This has a few advantages: I use less fuel, I never end up with "couscous soup," and I do not have to wait for my dinner to cool becuase the non-boiled water cools it down enough to eat rightway.
The 3-oz Fancy Feast stove is ideal for a 1-person cook system with a ~1-liter-ish pot. Personally, I use a .9-liter Evernew titanium pot, which has a 5-inch diameter bottom. If you plan to use a larger pot, and you are concerned about the pot being unstable on the 2.5-inch diameter Fancy Feast can, you can follow the same instructions as above but substitute the Fancy Feast can for a larger can, like a tuna fish can.
I have never done tests to prove it, but it's reasonable to think that the number of hole punches affect the heat output and the fuel efficiency of the stove. With more holes, the stove probably burns hotter and less efficient. With fewer holes, the stove probably burns less hot but more efficient. The optimum number of holes is probably a function of the pot (its material, thickness, and shape), the quantity and starting temperature of water being boiled, and the performance of the windscreen...in other words, too many other variables to make this sort of testing worthwhile.